Warning: Undefined array key "HTTP_REFERER" in /var/www/vhosts/tomorrowuk.net/httpdocs/wp-content/plugins/cornwall-insight/inc/cookie.php on line 52

Warning: Undefined variable $field in /var/www/vhosts/tomorrowuk.net/httpdocs/wp-content/plugins/cornwall-insight/inc/training.php on line 442

Warning: Undefined variable $field in /var/www/vhosts/tomorrowuk.net/httpdocs/wp-content/plugins/cornwall-insight/inc/teams.php on line 113

Notice: Function WP_Scripts::localize was called incorrectly. The $l10n parameter must be an array. To pass arbitrary data to scripts, use the wp_add_inline_script() function instead. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 5.7.0.) in /var/www/vhosts/tomorrowuk.net/httpdocs/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5835
BSUoS task force report sets scene for Targeted Charging Review decision - tmrw. test

BSUoS task force report sets scene for Targeted Charging Review decision

The Electricity System Operator (ESO) led task force issued its final report on 31 May, recommending that all the costs in balancing services use of system (BSUoS) charges should be treated solely as cost recovery. The report will feed into Ofgem’s decision on the Targeted Charging Review (TCR) Significant Code Review (SCR) that will be issued this summer.

BSUoS has fallen between the two stools of the two main parts of Ofgem’s network charging reviews; the SCR on residual charging and the SCR on forward-looking charges, as the regulator was unclear exactly what type of charge it should be. The task force was set up by Ofgem in November to consider whether any components of BSUoS could be charged in a more cost-reflective and forward-looking way that would effectively influence user behaviour.

The charge is presently around £1.2bn annually and recovers the cost of day-to-day operation of the transmission system and is made up of several elements, including the costs of constraints, frequency response services, provision of reserve, the costs of actions taken in the Balancing Mechanism and the ESO’s internal costs. It is currently calculated half-hourly and charged out to generators (except licence exemptible generators) and suppliers equally on a non-locational volume basis (per MWh basis). It is not charged on interconnector flows. The task force report now provides a strong steer on how BSUoS should be treated.

In its minded-to decision for the TCR SCR in December, Ofgem proposed that there should be changes to the way that BSUoS is charged to remove the current embedded benefit available to distributed generators. Its current proposed implementation date for these proposals is April 2021.

Meanwhile, under the CUSC arrangements, a proposal, CMP308 Removal of BSUoS charges from Generation, is being taken forward that seeks to place BSUoS charges entirely on demand. Raised by EDF Energy in October, this argues a current distortion would be removed by aligning GB with the practice of most European markets. Although Ofgem requested at that stage that no further work be done on the proposal, work has continued at the proposer’s request and with the CUSC Panel’s agreement; it is due to report to the CUSC Panel this month.

The strong support for the BSUoS task force conclusions in the short consultation on its draft findings gives weight to the charge continuing to be treated as a cost recovery charge, rather than a forward-looking charge that users can reasonably respond to. Who bears the charge and on what basis it is recovered is still to be determined. It is not out of the question, for example, that an alternative combining current initiatives could be considered: to place the charge only on suppliers and to remove the net charging arrangements, a combination that in effect removes both the current BSUoS embedded benefits, while being in line with Ofgem’s approach with cost recovery of residual charges.

Cornwall Insight will be holding a webinar on 27 June at 10am that will explore the key changes being considered by Ofgem’s network charging reviews, their implications and the timescales for implementation. For more information please contact training@cornwall-insight.com or call Richard on 01603 604400.

Related thinking

Regulation and policy

How will consumers take to Market-wide Half Hourly Settlement?

Ofgem published its decision to implement the move to Market-wide Half Hourly Settlement (MHHS) on 20 April. This confirms plans to move to new settlement arrangements over a four and a half year time period, with the Elexon-led Design Working Group’s Target Operating Model to be used as the blueprint. Meters...

Regulation and policy

Ofgem raises modifications ahead of RCC and new switching arrangements

The latest edition of our Faster Switching Service Report due to be issued this week includes the latest developments in Ofgem’s Switching Programme and the associated Retail Energy Code (REC). Launched in November 2019, the Retail Code Consolidation (RCC) Significant Code Review (SCR) set out Ofgem’s intention to amalgamate the...

Regulation and policy

Calm before the storm? 2021 energy supplier compliance developments

The latest update to our Energy Supplier Compliance Portal went live on 4 May and includes changes to the compliance landscape during February to April 2021. While the previous quarter’s update reflected new principles resulting from Ofgem’s Supplier Licensing Review (SLR) and protections for prepayment meter customers facing self-disconnection, Q121...

Regulation and policy

Electricity transmission charging reform – overtaken by changing priorities?

Charging for the transmission network is never out of the development process for long. From major reviews, such as that initiated under Project Transmit in 2010, to significant reforms such as removing the triad benefit from distributed generation in 2018, and a host of smaller developments, change seems the only...

Low carbon generation

Up north and down south – trends for generator TNUoS charging

The topic of generator Transmission Network Use of System (TNUoS) is becoming a subject of increasing interest for stakeholders as regulation, policy, and the generation mix create potential volatility for future charging trends. The significant costs posed through TNUoS are an important consideration for generators, with high variability between regions...

Commercial and market outlook

April showers bring DUoS for every half hour

Almost two years ago, Ofgem approved DCP268 DUoS Charging Using HH Settlement Data, which will move existing non-Half Hourly (NHH) settled demand customers onto time-based Half Hourly (HH) Distribution Use of System (DUoS) unit rate charges. With the modification to be implemented in the DCUSA on 1 April, we revisit...

Announcement

What’s changed? Celebrating 750 issues of Energy spectrum

Today marks 750 editions of Energy Spectrum, our flagship publication which covers news and insight on the energy market. To celebrate, we present six Energy Perspectives from past publications, going as far back as 2005, which we believe still have relevance today.  Issue 4 – ‘Smart metering’ - Energy policy’s missing...

Low carbon generation

New transmission charge forecast will help generators managing cost uncertainty and volatility

Transmission network use of system (TNUoS) charges represent a significant proportion of operating costs for many renewables generators, often exceeding 50% of annual running costs. For some, as recently highlighted by SSE in a recent report and to Members of the Scottish Parliament, they could present a barrier to investment in generation...

This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site.