Switching Programme full business case sees rising cost

The expected cost of delivering faster and more reliable switching to customers has risen, according to the Full Business Case for Ofgem’s Switching Programme.

Published on 14 May, the report indicates that present value direct costs to the industry have risen 28% to £425mn over an 18-year period, up from £332mn in Ofgem’s February 2018 analysis.

The programme is working to reform switching arrangements so that domestic customers will be able to switch supplier by the end of the next working day, with implementation to be in summer 2021. Non-domestic switches will have an extra 24 hours built-in. Together with improvements to reduce Erroneous Transfers and other issues in switching, Ofgem believes its reforms will increase consumer confidence in the progress and perception of ease, prompting greater take-up.

Costs have risen in a number of areas. One of the biggest impacts has been from the postponement of go-live by roughly six months, from the end of 2020 to mid-2021 (a decision made last year after the February impact assessment). This has increased costs by £27.8mn, while reducing the benefits case by £8mn due to delaying benefits to consumers.

Of a similar magnitude has been an additional £28.7mn that one of the existing system providers omitted from its previously submitted information, which Ofgem has not explained for reasons of confidentiality. Other changes include an extra £11.9mn as a result of plans being scrapped for the DCC to take over provision of the meter point enquiry service, and an additional £17.1mn for DCC and central costs for project management.

In recognition of the fact that switching rates have risen since the 2016 data used in its earlier analysis, and the fact that the default tariff cap had been implemented, the regulator revisited its assessment of direct consumer benefits. However, it stated that it remained satisfied that the estimated benefits from the earlier analysis remained a conservative estimate. This left the monetised benefit to consumers at £185mn-1,077mn; a reduction from the £227mn-1,069mn.

Ofgem went on to reiterate that, regardless of the direct or indirect impacts of the Switching Programme, the “key driver” for intervention would be the benefits of greater innovation and competition that it had not monetised. Additionally, it set out its view that a swift, reliable switching process was “essential” to an efficient market and would be an important consideration when lifting the default tariff cap.

The Full Business Case also included a more general review of the programme’s progress. Ofgem noted that licence changes to support reliability improvements would be in place by the end of July, with the preferred bidder having been selected for the registration and address services that make up the Central Switching Service. PwC has been appointed as programme co-ordinator, and licensed party assurance is in the process of being procured by Ofgem.

The regulator also acknowledged that it had allowed the DCC a maximum 12% margin for the Design, Build & Test (DBT) phase leading up to go-live, and that the company had set out its business case. This is to be baselined by the end of May and kept under review. Ofgem has also consulted on the Retail Energy Code Company’s budget for the new financial year and suppliers will be invoiced as funding parties. For this first year, the largest part of its costs will be for supporting the Programme Co-ordinator and assurance providers.

Lastly, Ofgem confirmed that it is advancing the programme into the DBT phase, where systems will be procured and the transition prepared for. This occurred on 14 May, delayed from the original planned date of 2 April. The regulator warned that this was only the first self-assessment milestone it would require parties to pass.

It is disappointing but unsurprising for an industry programme to see its projected costs rise. Ofgem continues to highlight the benefits consumers should see – which are substantial – but it is becoming less clear that they outweigh costs to the industry.

Cornwall Insight is launching a new service dedicated to helping market participants understand the Switching Programme and associated Retail Energy Code. For more information please contact Steven Britton on 01603 542126 or s.britton@cornwall-insight.com.

Related thinking

Heat networks

Reallocating electricity policy costs to incentivise low carbon heating technologies

Funding the cost of decarbonising the power system has mainly been through the consumers' electricity bills. In fact, in 2020-21 these costs amounted to a whopping £10bn. But is this method of raising revenue for decarbonisation still fit for purpose when faced with the need to decarbonise the nation's heat?...

Regulation and policy

How will consumers take to Market-wide Half Hourly Settlement?

Ofgem published its decision to implement the move to Market-wide Half Hourly Settlement (MHHS) on 20 April. This confirms plans to move to new settlement arrangements over a four and a half year time period, with the Elexon-led Design Working Group’s Target Operating Model to be used as the blueprint. Meters...

Regulation and policy

Ofgem raises modifications ahead of RCC and new switching arrangements

The latest edition of our Faster Switching Service Report due to be issued this week includes the latest developments in Ofgem’s Switching Programme and the associated Retail Energy Code (REC). Launched in November 2019, the Retail Code Consolidation (RCC) Significant Code Review (SCR) set out Ofgem’s intention to amalgamate the...

Regulation and policy

Calm before the storm? 2021 energy supplier compliance developments

The latest update to our Energy Supplier Compliance Portal went live on 4 May and includes changes to the compliance landscape during February to April 2021. While the previous quarter’s update reflected new principles resulting from Ofgem’s Supplier Licensing Review (SLR) and protections for prepayment meter customers facing self-disconnection, Q121...

Regulation and policy

Electricity transmission charging reform – overtaken by changing priorities?

Charging for the transmission network is never out of the development process for long. From major reviews, such as that initiated under Project Transmit in 2010, to significant reforms such as removing the triad benefit from distributed generation in 2018, and a host of smaller developments, change seems the only...

Commercial and market outlook

April showers bring DUoS for every half hour

Almost two years ago, Ofgem approved DCP268 DUoS Charging Using HH Settlement Data, which will move existing non-Half Hourly (NHH) settled demand customers onto time-based Half Hourly (HH) Distribution Use of System (DUoS) unit rate charges. With the modification to be implemented in the DCUSA on 1 April, we revisit...

Low carbon generation

New transmission charge forecast will help generators managing cost uncertainty and volatility

Transmission network use of system (TNUoS) charges represent a significant proportion of operating costs for many renewables generators, often exceeding 50% of annual running costs. For some, as recently highlighted by SSE in a recent report and to Members of the Scottish Parliament, they could present a barrier to investment in generation...

Home supply and services

Energy suppliers must be ready to demonstrate compliance with new principles

From 22 January, energy suppliers were required to follow new principles resulting from Ofgem’s Supplier Licensing Review (SLR), which initially kicked off nearly three years ago. Such was the breadth of the SLR, changes were introduced in two rounds, with the first round of changes bringing the introduction of tougher...