The ups and downs of energy supply: Brand and technology can make the difference in retail energy

Three events in the last week have shown not only the contrasting fortunes in the energy supply market but also the roles of brand and technology in enabling success. The events are the credit default under electricity wholesale balancing rules of very small supplier Gen4U, the new energy supply deal between retailer M&S and Octopus and the failure announced by Ofgem just a few minutes ago of the non-domestic supplier National Gas and Power.

Gen4U struggled to grow a customer base in a domestic market characterised by many suppliers offering the same kinds of tariffs and using one of a small number of outsourced technology platforms. In such circumstances, it is hard to differentiate and avoid a race to the bottom on price to secure customers and growth. Unfortunately for Gen4U it fell into default under the electricity balancing and settlement code on 17 July with the company understood to be voluntarily winding itself up.

National Gas and Power, with around 80 customers, has ceased trading and Ofgem has appointed Hudson Energy as Supplier of Last Resort (SoLR). National Gas and Power entered the market in June 2017 with shorter contracts aimed at businesses with poor credit, a part of the market that many non-domestic suppliers generally look to avoid. The company had initially been operating under a white-label arrangement with Hudson Energy. The regulator’s press statement also explains that for the first time as far as we are aware, it appointed Hudson Energy without requesting expressions of interest from any other party. This was partly because of the pre-existing relationship and the small number of affected customers and obviously a pragmatic and sensible solution in the circumstances.  

In contrast, M&S has launched a “new strategic deal” with Octopus to “transform the energy market for thousands of customers”. This announcement came within two weeks of the company announcing the end of its white-labelling arrangement with SSE. Though that arrangement had been in place for nine years, it seemed to have been drifting for some time, especially in the wake of mis-selling allegations about SSE which came to a head in 2013.

M&S’s statement launching the new deal emphasised its transparency, quality and innovation with Jonathan Hazeldine, Head of M&S Energy citing Octopus as “the best partner to help transform and grow M&S Energy into a digital, progressive and commercially competitive arm of M&S.”

The latter point emphasises that the deal needs to be seen in a wider context than just the energy market being part of a five-year company transformation programme. That programme is increasing the flexibility, sustainability and innovation in the company and its supplier base and is seen as critical to M&S’s long-term success. The link with sustainability is driven through the company’s “Plan A” which “enables our customers to have a positive impact on wellbeing, communities and the planet through all that we do”. Innovation is evidenced through M&S’s partnership with Microsoft for using AI in the retail environment and a joint venture with Founders Factory to invest in potentially innovative and disruptive start-ups from which it can learn.

The events of the last week show that innovation in the retail space continues. High street retailers like M&S continue to evolve their models to remain on top of a challenging environment, while the failure of two suppliers in the space of a few days demonstrates that although innovation continues, it naturally does not always result in success.

Related thinking

Home supply and services

Consolidation in the energy market predicted to continue

It has been a turbulent time for the retail energy market, experiencing a period of consolidation with mergers and supplier exits. This supplier consolidation is expected to continue in the near term. If suppliers fail to shift their business models for the new world it is likely to continue, according...

Regulation and policy

How will consumers take to Market-wide Half Hourly Settlement?

Ofgem published its decision to implement the move to Market-wide Half Hourly Settlement (MHHS) on 20 April. This confirms plans to move to new settlement arrangements over a four and a half year time period, with the Elexon-led Design Working Group’s Target Operating Model to be used as the blueprint. Meters...

Regulation and policy

Ofgem raises modifications ahead of RCC and new switching arrangements

The latest edition of our Faster Switching Service Report due to be issued this week includes the latest developments in Ofgem’s Switching Programme and the associated Retail Energy Code (REC). Launched in November 2019, the Retail Code Consolidation (RCC) Significant Code Review (SCR) set out Ofgem’s intention to amalgamate the...

Regulation and policy

Calm before the storm? 2021 energy supplier compliance developments

The latest update to our Energy Supplier Compliance Portal went live on 4 May and includes changes to the compliance landscape during February to April 2021. While the previous quarter’s update reflected new principles resulting from Ofgem’s Supplier Licensing Review (SLR) and protections for prepayment meter customers facing self-disconnection, Q121...

Regulation and policy

Electricity transmission charging reform – overtaken by changing priorities?

Charging for the transmission network is never out of the development process for long. From major reviews, such as that initiated under Project Transmit in 2010, to significant reforms such as removing the triad benefit from distributed generation in 2018, and a host of smaller developments, change seems the only...

Commercial and market outlook

April showers bring DUoS for every half hour

Almost two years ago, Ofgem approved DCP268 DUoS Charging Using HH Settlement Data, which will move existing non-Half Hourly (NHH) settled demand customers onto time-based Half Hourly (HH) Distribution Use of System (DUoS) unit rate charges. With the modification to be implemented in the DCUSA on 1 April, we revisit...

Low carbon generation

New transmission charge forecast will help generators managing cost uncertainty and volatility

Transmission network use of system (TNUoS) charges represent a significant proportion of operating costs for many renewables generators, often exceeding 50% of annual running costs. For some, as recently highlighted by SSE in a recent report and to Members of the Scottish Parliament, they could present a barrier to investment in generation...

Home supply and services

Energy suppliers must be ready to demonstrate compliance with new principles

From 22 January, energy suppliers were required to follow new principles resulting from Ofgem’s Supplier Licensing Review (SLR), which initially kicked off nearly three years ago. Such was the breadth of the SLR, changes were introduced in two rounds, with the first round of changes bringing the introduction of tougher...