Why now? Regulation in the TPI market

Ofgem published its long-awaited policy proposals on 29 July following a review of the microbusiness sector. These build on its initial consultation from May 2019 and look to ensure that microbusinesses can access a competitive market and secure adequate levels of protection. The approach will be a defining moment for the sector with measures that act in the manner of a Code of Practice without there being one. Instead, the solutions put forward in the microbusiness review would bring an indirect mandated change to the Third Party Intermediary (TPI) through the supply licence. Here, we take a look at the impacts on the TPI sector, highlighted in our third quarterly update of the Third Party Intermediaries in the Business and Industrial Supply Markets report.

Many of the proposals (detailed in figure 1) are centered around TPI practices, with Ofgem stating that “stakeholder views and evidence point to dissatisfaction with some brokerage services and poor practice by a minority of TPIs.” These issues have been discussed as far back as 2013, when Citizens Advice raised concerns about a lack of transparency in the market, especially on commission levels and supplier coverage and a poor quality service provision leading to sub-optimal advice. Attempts to mitigate these issues so far, have been unsuccessful.

Regulation in the TPI market blog. Ofgem's policy measures for Strategic Microbusiness Review -

When it comes to the package of proposed policies, Ofgem’s primary focus is on adapting the regulatory framework for suppliers to account for the behaviour of TPIs. The most important is a new TPI conduct principle which would introduce a principles-based requirement for suppliers to ensure TPIs they work with conduct themselves appropriately and in a way that treats customers fairly. Ofgem proposes extending relevant parts of the existing ‘Standards of Conduct’ to achieve this.

Ofgem also proposes introducing a requirement for suppliers to only work with TPIs signed up to an alternative dispute resolution scheme, which would follow a framework similar to that of an Ombudsman. This seems to be a lesson learned from Ofgem’s TPI Code of Practice (TPI CoP) development, which as it would have been voluntary, struggled for agreement on how it would be funded. Suppliers were unwilling to pay to regulate a market that they were not commercially active in. There is an opportunity for TPIs to lead the conversation in developing the new framework that will determine practices across the sector, with the alternative being a supplier led approach.

Other proposed measures include the disclosure of commission by suppliers, on account statements and at the request of the microbusiness customer. The regulator cited instances where microbusinesses were unaware of the TPI costs and reasoned that provision of this information will reduce overall consumer harm by enabling consumers to make informed choices about TPI services. It also acknowledges that including additional commission payment data may increase the complexity of contract information sent to consumers and suggests this could be an issue for some.

It is understandable that Ofgem feels the need to do this because transparency has been an issue in the TPI market for more than 20 years. However, we are concerned about mandating suppliers and think TPIs should disclose their own charges to their customers, therefore reducing an extreme scenario whereby this is used in marketing to favour direct sales, against TPIs by suppliers.

Ofgem’s review builds on the extensive work alongside that of Citizens Advice and the Competitions and Markets Authority over the past decade or so, finding a way to achieve some long desired objectives. While many industry stakeholders have taken a cautious approach to the new consultation, many are optimistic that trust, at least in the microbusiness sector, will increase.

If you are interested in regulation in the TPI market or want more information on Ofgem’s review of the microbusiness market, alongside updates on how COVID-19 is impacting the TPI market, find out more about our TPIs in the Business and Industrial Energy Supply Markets report.

About Third Party Intermediaries in the Business and Industrial Energy Supply Markets

Third Party Intermediaries in the Business and Industrial Energy Supply Markets maps the business energy supply markets and the role of TPIs in them. It is a subscription service including an annual baseline report and quarterly updates. It also profiles over 200 TPIs and ranks them using the Cornwall Insight Indexes for SME and I&C sectors.

If you are interested in subscribing to our TPI report, please contact m.lloyd@cornwall-insight.com

Related thinking

Regulation and policy

How will consumers take to Market-wide Half Hourly Settlement?

Ofgem published its decision to implement the move to Market-wide Half Hourly Settlement (MHHS) on 20 April. This confirms plans to move to new settlement arrangements over a four and a half year time period, with the Elexon-led Design Working Group’s Target Operating Model to be used as the blueprint. Meters...

Regulation and policy

Ofgem raises modifications ahead of RCC and new switching arrangements

The latest edition of our Faster Switching Service Report due to be issued this week includes the latest developments in Ofgem’s Switching Programme and the associated Retail Energy Code (REC). Launched in November 2019, the Retail Code Consolidation (RCC) Significant Code Review (SCR) set out Ofgem’s intention to amalgamate the...

Regulation and policy

Calm before the storm? 2021 energy supplier compliance developments

The latest update to our Energy Supplier Compliance Portal went live on 4 May and includes changes to the compliance landscape during February to April 2021. While the previous quarter’s update reflected new principles resulting from Ofgem’s Supplier Licensing Review (SLR) and protections for prepayment meter customers facing self-disconnection, Q121...

Regulation and policy

Electricity transmission charging reform – overtaken by changing priorities?

Charging for the transmission network is never out of the development process for long. From major reviews, such as that initiated under Project Transmit in 2010, to significant reforms such as removing the triad benefit from distributed generation in 2018, and a host of smaller developments, change seems the only...

Commercial and market outlook

April showers bring DUoS for every half hour

Almost two years ago, Ofgem approved DCP268 DUoS Charging Using HH Settlement Data, which will move existing non-Half Hourly (NHH) settled demand customers onto time-based Half Hourly (HH) Distribution Use of System (DUoS) unit rate charges. With the modification to be implemented in the DCUSA on 1 April, we revisit...

Low carbon generation

New transmission charge forecast will help generators managing cost uncertainty and volatility

Transmission network use of system (TNUoS) charges represent a significant proportion of operating costs for many renewables generators, often exceeding 50% of annual running costs. For some, as recently highlighted by SSE in a recent report and to Members of the Scottish Parliament, they could present a barrier to investment in generation...

Business supply and services

Energy suppliers must be ready to demonstrate compliance with new principles

From 22 January, energy suppliers were required to follow new principles resulting from Ofgem’s Supplier Licensing Review (SLR), which initially kicked off nearly three years ago. Such was the breadth of the SLR, changes were introduced in two rounds, with the first round of changes bringing the introduction of tougher...

Regulation and policy

Ofgem “hands-on” in RIIO-2 as net zero route unfolds

During the next round of the RIIO price controls, Ofgem can be expected to take a more hands-on approach to outputs the networks are required to provide and the allowed revenues they can charge their users or consumers. This will have impacts for network development including the enabling of electric...